USPTO serial 86100919
3D RAD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TWOHIG, SHANNON MARIE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 121
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with 3D RAD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ansel M. Schwartz
ANSEL M SCHWARTZ201 N CRAIG ST STE 304PITTSBURGH, PA 15213-1516UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | cancer treatment equipment using an accelerator device | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 27, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Mar 15, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2016 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 16, 2016 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 10, 2016 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 8, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 5, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 11, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 18, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |