USPTO serial 86101919
DAHLIA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KENEALY, NATALIE LANGFORD
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DAHLIA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Fresh Meadows, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
THOMAS DUNLAP
THOMAS DUNLAP DUNLAP, BENNET & LUDWIG PLLC211 CHURCH ST SELEESBURG, VA 20175UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Fine and fashion jewelry; Necklaces; pendants; Earrings; Bracelets; Rings; Jewelry sets comprised of necklaces, bracelets, rings, earrings; Brooches; pins being jewelry; Cufflinks; Jewelry boxes | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
| 035 | Retail and wholesale store services featuring fine and fashion jewelry and jewelry accessories, clothing and accessories; Retail and wholesale mail order catalog services featuring fine and fashion jewelry and jewelry accessories, clothing and accessories; Online retail and wholesale store services featuring fine and fashion jewelry and jewelry accessories, clothing and accessories; Promoting the goods and services of others by providing a website featuring links to online retail wholesale stores, retail and wholesale website services of others | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2017 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 27, 2017 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 7, 2017 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2017 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2017 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 2, 2016 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 2, 2016 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 4, 2016 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 27, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 26, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 26, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 26, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 17, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |