Drawing for MUSERK MUSIC POWERING VIDEO

USPTO serial 86103064

MUSERK MUSIC POWERING VIDEO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MUSERK MUSIC POWERING VIDEO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. deBrauwere

ROBERT J. DEBRAUWERE PRYOR CASHMAN LLP7 TIMES SQ FL 3NEW YORK, NY 10036-6569UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Commercial administration of the licensing of the music of othersACTIVE
036Administering the licensing of copyrighted music, namely, collecting license fees on behalf of independent writers and publishers and making payments to the copyright owners of the musicACTIVE
041Providing an online computer database in the fields of music and entertainment featuring algorithms for music-based and non-music-based search functions; online music services, namely, providing electronic library services which feature musical and non-musical sound recordings via an online computer network; providing an online searchable database featuring cataloged and indexed recorded music and sounds; providing a website featuring resources, namely, non-downloadable publications in the nature of articles and instruction in the field of music licensingACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 14, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Sep 29, 2015IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED
Sep 29, 2015TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP
Aug 31, 2015INCEITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST
Aug 12, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED
Mar 27, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 26, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL
Feb 12, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 12, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 17, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Jun 17, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 28, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
May 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
May 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Apr 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Apr 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Apr 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 16, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 16, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 5, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED
Nov 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Oct 31, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance