USPTO serial 86103385
MICROTOUCH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 605
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARESCA, MEREDITH Z
- Law office
- —
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MICROTOUCH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, NM
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. Brucker
William J. Brucker Stetina Brunda Garred & Brucker75 Enterprise, Suite 250Aliso Viejo, CA 92656UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Biometric sensors for identifying individuals, verifying the identification of individuals, and authenticating individuals; biometric sensors with spoof detection, for identifying individuals, verifying the identification of individuals, authenticating individuals, and detecting liveness of purported skin sites; miniaturized biometric sensors for identifying individuals, verifying the identification of individuals, authenticating individuals, and detecting liveness of purported skin sites; biometric sensors as an integral component of portable electronic devices, namely, tablet computers, laptop computers, smartphones, and handheld computers, for identifying individuals, verifying the identification of individuals, authenticating individuals, and detecting liveness of purported skin sites; biometric sensors as an integral component of electromechanical locks for identifying individuals, verifying the identification of individuals, authenticating individuals, and detecting liveness of purported skin sites; optical sensors in biometric applications; optical and optical-plus-impedance detectors measuring spatial, spectral, and spatiospectral biometric parameters; optical and optical-plus-impedance detectors measuring optical, impedance, and optical-plus-impedance biometric parameters; biometric computer peripherals for computational devices, namely, personal computers, laptops, tablet computers, smartphones, vehicle computers, and industrial equipment computers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 11, 2014 | MAB5 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 10, 2014 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 2, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 16, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |