Drawing for INFRARED

USPTO serial 86103518

INFRARED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INFRARED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Dana P. Jozefczyk

Dana P. Jozfczyk Merchant & Gould PCPO Box 2910Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Software for protecting and securing the integrity of computing devices, mobile phones and network systems; security software for protecting computers from malicious softwareACTIVE—
042Computer security services, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities, detecting and assessing threats to computing devices; computer services, namely, providing information regarding risks and vulnerabilities for computers, networks and mobile electronic devices; computer services for protecting and securing the integrity of computing devices, mobile phones and network systems, namely, providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable software for protecting and securing the integrity of mobile phones, computing devices, and network systemsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 23, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 23, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 3, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 30, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 21, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 26, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 6, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 24, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 7, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 19, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 19, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 19, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 12, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 31, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance