USPTO serial 86104257
MASON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
LOS ANGELES, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ginam Lee
GINAM LEE LEE COUNSEL, APLC3600 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1510LOS ANGELES, CA 90010-2619UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Body and beauty care cosmetics; Cleansing creams; Colognes, perfumes; Cosmetic creams; Cosmetic facial blotting papers; Cosmetic hair dressing preparations; Cosmetic masks; Cosmetic oils; Cosmetic pads; Cosmetic pencils; Cosmetics and make-up; Cosmetics in general, including perfumes; Cosmetics, namely, compacts; Cosmetics, namely, lip primer; Cosmetics, namely, lip repairers; Eyebrow cosmetics; Lip stains; Mask pack for cosmetic purposes; Nail paint; Oils for cosmetic purposes; Private label cosmetics; Skin and body topical lotions, creams and oils for cosmetic use; Skin conditioning creams for cosmetic purposes; Skin fresheners; Soaps; Solid powder for compacts; Toners; Topical skin sprays for cosmetic purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Jewelry and imitation jewelry; Jewelry boxes; Jewelry cases; Jewelry chains; Jewelry clips for adapting pierced earrings to clip-on earrings; Jewelry for the head; Jewelry in the nature of armbands; Jewelry watches; Jewelry, namely, amulets; Jewelry, namely, anklets; Jewelry, namely, arm cuffs; Jewelry, namely, crosses; Pet jewelry; Rings; Watches and jewelry; Clocks, jewelry and imitation jewelry; Women's jewelry | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Backpacks, book bags, sports bags, bum bags, wallets; Fashion handbags; Handbags; Purses and wallets; Luggage; Trunks; Straps for handbags | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Bathing suits; Belts; Blouses; Body suits; Button down shirts; Cardigans; Children's and infant's apparel, namely, jumpers, overall sleepwear, pajamas, rompers and one-piece garments; Coats; Dresses; Headwear; Jackets; Jeans; Leggings; Men's suits, women's suits; Neckwear; Pants; Pantyhose; Rain wear; Sandals; Scarfs; Shirts; Shoes; Skirts; Sweaters; T-shirts; Ties; Tops; Underwear; Vests; Women's clothing, namely, shirts, dresses, skirts, blouses; Wraps | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 25, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 25, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 27, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 16, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 15, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |