Drawing for JUGGERNAUT

USPTO serial 86104292

JUGGERNAUT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CHISOLM, KEVON
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with JUGGERNAUT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Denise Taliaferro

328 URQUHART AVEc/o IGT Canada Solutions ULCMONCTON, NEW BRUNSWICK, E1H2R6

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Reconfigurable casino and lottery gaming equipment, namely, gaming machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 3, 2021MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2021ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 19, 2020GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 19, 2020CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 26, 2020RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2020GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2020GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2020CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 30, 2020TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 30, 2020CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 27, 2020ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 29, 2019GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 29, 2019CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 16, 2019RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Sep 5, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 5, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2019ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 13, 2019REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 4, 2019GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 4, 2019CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 27, 2019TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 27, 2019CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 26, 2019ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2018GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2018GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 31, 2018CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2018RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 5, 2018GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2018CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 29, 2018TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 29, 2018CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2018ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2017GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 2, 2017CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2017RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 27, 2017GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 27, 2017CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2017TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2017CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 17, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2017ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 12, 2016GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2016GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 12, 2016CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 22, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 18, 2016GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2016CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 4, 2016TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2016CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 1, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2016ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Nov 4, 2015ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 26, 2015GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2015CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jul 31, 2015RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 30, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 29, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 29, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 28, 2015TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 28, 2015ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2014GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2014GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Sep 15, 2014CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Aug 25, 2014RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 12, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 18, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 13, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 1, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance