USPTO serial 86104921
HEAT ON DEMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4766090Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 30, 2015
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with HEAT ON DEMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Wichita Falls, TX
Wichita Falls, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey G. Degenfelder
JEFFREY G DEGENFELDER CARSTENS & CAHOON LLPPO BOX 802334DALLAS, TX 75380-2334UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 040 | Oil and gas services, namely, providing frac water heating services in connection with oil and gas well hydraulic fracturing operations | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2021 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 30, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 22, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2015 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 18, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 23, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 22, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 14, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 13, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |