USPTO serial 86105401
MILLER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MILLER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Vancouver, WA
Vancouver, WA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James K. Coons
JAMES K. COONS HUTCHINSON, COX, COONS, ORR & SHERLOCK, P.C.PO BOX 10886EUGENE, OR 97440-2886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Software and electronic games, namely, software games recorded on CD-ROM and digital video discs for computers; software games recorded on CD-ROMs, digital video discs and cartridges for console and individual portable gaming systems; software games that are downloadable from a remote computer site; software games that are downloadable from the internet; software games recorded on USB flash drives; software games recorded on digital memory cards; software games for mobile phones, personal digital assistance, handheld computers and consoles and portable gaming systems; computer game programs downloadable via the internet; computer game programs; computer game software; computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; computer game software for use with personal computers; downloadable computer game programs; downloadable electronic game programs; downloadable electronic game programs used on social networking sites that may be accessed via the internet and wireless devices; interactive multimedia computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 13, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 15, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 25, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 22, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 24, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 16, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |