USPTO serial 86105629
ECOMUNCHKINS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUONG, ANGELA GAW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOMUNCHKINS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Calgary, AB, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tim Baker
TIM BAKER SMUGLERS LLP480 LISGAR ST.OTTAWA, ON, K1R5H3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Baby related products, namely, baby bottles, bottle sterilizers, baby bathtubs, baby carriers, bibs, baby clothing, nipples for baby bottles and baby toys, namely, bath toys, plush toys and stuffed toys | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 2, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 2, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |