USPTO serial 86106058
APEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5003744Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 19, 2016
- Examiner
- CANTONE, KERI H
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with APEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
L3HARRIS UNMANNED SYSTEMS, INC.
MELBOURNE, FL
Carrollton, TX
Carrollton, TX
Carrollton, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward Kelly
EDWARD KELLY TIAJOLOFF & KELLY LLP405 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10174-0002UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Components of unmanned air vehicle system, namely, a propulsion system comprised of motors and associated batteries and controllers | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2014 |
| 009 | Components of unmanned air vehicle system, namely, computer hardware and computer software for use in the fields of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance and interfaces for computers, communication equipment in the nature of radio transmitters, ground command and control equipment in the nature of radio transmitters, electric sensors, video terminals, video management equipment in the nature of digital video recorders, and launch and recovery equipment in the nature of self-propelled and pneumatic launchers, parachutes, and recovery nets | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by L3HARRIS UNMANNED SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 Unmanned Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 Unmanned Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by L-3 Unmanned Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named APEX
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 3, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 14, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 21, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 20, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 20, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 12, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 27, 2015 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 13, 2015 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 30, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 28, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 28, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 28, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| May 20, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 20, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 29, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |