Drawing for SAKE CONVERSATION CHAIR

USPTO serial 86106156

SAKE CONVERSATION CHAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAKE CONVERSATION CHAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Joy Kattwinkel

LINDA JOY KATTWINKEL OWEN, WICKERSHAM & ERICKSON, P.C.455 MARKET ST STE 1910SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-5408UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
006Sculptures made of non-precious metalACTIVE—
020FurnitureACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 2, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 2, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 25, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 24, 2017EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 21, 2017EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 21, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2017EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 26, 2017EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 26, 2017EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 26, 2017EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 9, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Nov 15, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 15, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 19, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 25, 2016EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 25, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 25, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 17, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 17, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 17, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 26, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 31, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 31, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 11, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 23, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 9, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Sep 9, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 9, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 22, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 22, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 18, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 19, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 7, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 2, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance