Drawing for TOP DOG DIRECT

USPTO serial 86107088

TOP DOG DIRECT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAGLIARDI, JEANINE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TOP DOG DIRECT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Martin L. Faigus

MARTIN L FAIGUS CAESAR RIVISE PCSEVEN PENN CENTER 12TH FLOOR1635 MARKET STREETPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035the marketing of new products through television, the internet and at retailACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 19, 2016MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 18, 2016ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 18, 2016EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 5, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 18, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 14, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 22, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 22, 2015GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2015CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Apr 1, 2015EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 1, 2015JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 1, 2015EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 31, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 31, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 31, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Oct 2, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Oct 2, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 2, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 1, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 14, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance