Drawing for HOMEMADE MATTERS

USPTO serial 86107195

HOMEMADE MATTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HESIK, APRIL ANNE
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with HOMEMADE MATTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen H. Bean

Stephen H. Bean LEGENDS LAW GROUP, PLLC330 North Main StreetKaysville, UT 84037UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Power operated grain milling machines, electric food blenders, electric food grinders, electric food processors, beverage processing machines, aerated beverage making machines, non-aerated beverage making machinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2020CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 3, 2020TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2020ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2020REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2020COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 26, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 26, 2016CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2016SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 22, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2015IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 10, 2015EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Jul 11, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Jul 10, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 10, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 10, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 10, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 11, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Dec 9, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 9, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 10, 2014NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2014NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 24, 2014CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 21, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 17, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 4, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance