USPTO serial 86107215
RF2D
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PARK, JENNY K
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RF2D?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Colorado Springs, CO
Colorado Springs, CO
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard W. Hanes
Richard W. Hanes Hanes & Bartels LLC102 S. Tejon Street, Suite 800Colorado Springs, CO 80903UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Analog to digital converter (ADCs); Antenna parameter measuring apparatus; Antennas for wireless communications apparatus; Circuit boards; Circuit boards provided with integrated circuits; Computer chips; Computer hardware; Computer hardware for telecommunications; Computer hardware for wireless content delivery; Computer hardware, namely, wireless network extenders; Computer hardware, namely, wireless network repeaters; Computer network adapters; Computer networking hardware; Computer software for wireless content delivery; Devices for wireless radio transmission; Electronic circuit board; Electronic circuit cards; Electronic circuits; Electronic combiners for connecting antennas and receivers; Electronic communications systems comprised of computer hardware and software for the transmission of data between two points; Electronic integrated circuits; Electronic semi-conductors; Encoders; Filters for radio interference suppression; Frequency converters; Integrated circuit cards and components; Integrated circuit modules; Integrated circuits; Integrated circuits and integrated circuit cores for use in wireless communications and wireless communication equipment and apparatus and digital signal processors (DSP); Large scale integrated circuits; Micro processors; Microchips; Microcircuits; Microprocessors and semi-conductors; Oscilloscopes; Radar receivers with amplifiers; Radio receivers; Radio receivers and monitors for reproduction of sound and signals; Radio receivers and radio signal tuners; Radio receivers and transmitters; Radio transceivers; Radio transmitters; Radio transmitters and receivers; Radios; Receivers of electronic signals; Reconfigurable processors for use in wireless communication handsets and network equipment in the field of wideband communications; Satellite receivers; Satellite telephones; Satellite transmitters and receivers; Semi-conductors; Semiconductor chips; Semiconductor devices; Semiconductors; Silicon chips; Silicon wafers; Software defined radio; Spectrum analyzers; Telecommunications transmitters; Telephone receivers; Telephone transmitters; Transmitters of electronic signals; Very large scale integration (VLSI) semiconductor integrated circuits; Wireless adapters for computers; Wireless adapters used to link computers to a telecommunications network; Wireless broadband radios; Wireless receivers and transmitters for portable media players; Wireless telephones; Wireless transceiver radio; Wireless transmitters and receivers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2019 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 28, 2019 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2018 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2018 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 26, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 10, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2017 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 11, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 7, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 27, 2015 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 7, 2015 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 10, 2015 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 8, 2015 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 3, 2015 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 26, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 7, 2014 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2014 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 5, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 22, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 24, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |