USPTO serial 86107992
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Cade Kauffman
24 SMITH RDMIDLAND, TX 79705-4403UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Clothing for protection against accidents; Clothing for protection against accidents, irradiation and fire; Clothing for protection against chemicals and radiation; Clothing for protection against fire; Fall protection equipment for fall restraint and fall arrest, namely, bars, anchors, harnesses, lines, lanyards, carabiners and anchorage connectors; Fall protection equipment for fall restraint and fall arrest, namely, harnesses; Fall protection equipment for fall restraint and fall arrest, namely, lines; Fire blankets and fire extinguishers; Fire extinguishers; Fire extinguishing apparatus; Fire-extinguishers; Fire-extinguishing blankets; Fire-extinguishing systems; Gas detectors for detecting the presence of gas; Protective eyewear; Protective helmets; Respiratory masks for non-medical purposes; Safety contact plugs; Safety equipment, namely, a lifeline system for horizontal or vertical movement to which a worker is attached for protection against fall hazards, composed of harnesses, lanyards, cables, lifeliners; Safety equipment, namely, beacon lights; Safety equipment, namely, explosive containment vessel; Safety equipment, namely, fire escape ladders; Safety eyewear; Safety goggles; Safety harnesses for auto racing; Safety harnesses other than for vehicles or sports purposes; Safety helmets; Safety markers; Safety nets; Safety products, namely, embroidered reflective patches to be worn on clothing; Safety products, namely, reflective helmet skirts; Safety products, namely, reflective safety bands to be worn on the body; Safety restraints; Safety sensors, namely, carbon monoxide detectors, smoke detectors, and combination carbon monoxide and smoke detectors; Safety tarpaulins; Safety traffic cones; Safety valves for flow shutoff in well construction | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
| 045 | Analysis and consultation pertaining to job site safety; Consultation services in the field of the safety needs of commercial and industrial companies; Consulting in the field of workplace safety; Consulting services in the field of public safety; Consulting services in the field of state and federal regulatory compliance requirements for personnel safety; Fire fighting services; Fire prevention consultation; Fire-fighting; Regulatory compliance consulting in the field of OSHA; Rental of protective clothing and equipment for safety purposes; Safety consulting services in the fields of hazard assessments and abatement procedures; Security services, namely, conducting recovery operations for the recovery of property and personnel | ACTIVE | Jun 1, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2014 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |