USPTO serial 86108210
IDENTITY BLOCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 5171826Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 28, 2017
- Examiner
- STOKOLS, GWEN P
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with IDENTITY BLOCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert S. Katz
ROBERT S. KATZ BANNER & WITCOFF, LTD.1100 13TH ST NW STE 1200WASHINGTON, DC 20005-4051UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | RFID card sleeves embedded with a protective barrier for protecting against theft via radio frequency transmission of data and personal information embedded in cards, for use with debit cards, credit cards, gift cards, passports, access cards, public transit passes, health insurance cards and drivers' licenses; Bank note size shielding wallet inserts embedded with a protective barrier for protecting against theft via radio frequency transmission of data and personal information embedded in cards, for use with debit cards, credit cards, gift cards, passports, access cards, public transit passes, health insurance cards and drivers' licenses; mobile application for cellular telephones, used to identify and deactivate near-field communications on mobile telephones | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 18, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 13, 2023 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 28, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 28, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 22, 2017 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2017 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2016 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 7, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Sep 13, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 19, 2016 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 29, 2016 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 3, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2016 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 24, 2016 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 9, 2016 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 2, 2016 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 19, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 3, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2014 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |