Drawing for RESURGENCE SERIES

USPTO serial 86108233

RESURGENCE SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WATSON, JULIE A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RESURGENCE SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas J. Boyarski

NICHOLAS J. BOYARSKI BLUE OCEAN ENTERPRISES, INC.205 S MELDRUM STFORT COLLINS, CO 80521-2603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Covers and cases for handheld electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, tablet computers, e-book readers, and computers; battery management systems consisting of rechargeable batteries and operating firmware in cases that house and electrically connect to electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, tablet computers, e-book readers, and computers; universal battery packs that electrically connect to electronic devices, namely, mobile phones, portable media players, digital cameras, tablet computers, e-book readers, and computersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 6, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 12, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 12, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 10, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 15, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 15, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 26, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 19, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 18, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 13, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 5, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance