USPTO serial 86109184
UNIVERSAL POINTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ORTIGA PALMER, RAMONA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with UNIVERSAL POINTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
West Hollywood, CA
WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA
WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas H. Zellerbach and Kristin S. Cornuelle
LINDA PARTMANN ORRICK HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP2050 MAIN ST STE 1100IRVINE, CA 92614-8280UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers and other wireless devices, namely, software for use in providing a travel and hotel customer loyalty program for participating entities, and promoting the travel and hotel services of others, through a travel and hotel customer loyalty program, whereby program members can earn points and other incentives and redeem such points for lodging and travel-related benefits; computer application software for mobile phones, handheld computers and other wireless devices, namely, software for use in providing a travel and hotel loyalty program featuring loyalty points, discount rates, and recognition benefits for commercial, promotional and/or advertising purposes, all of the foregoing excluding rewards related to telecommunication companies, telecommunications goods or services, and credit card services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by James Gancos
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSAL POINTS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by UNIVERSAL POINTS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named UNIVERSAL POINTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 8, 2016 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2016 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2016 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 24, 2015 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 24, 2015 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 21, 2015 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Dec 15, 2014 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 16, 2014 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 4, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 15, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 10, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2014 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |