USPTO serial 86109364
PUTTING-PAT-SYSTEM.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEHKER, DAWN FELDMAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PUTTING-PAT-SYSTEM.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
St. Helena Island, SC
St. Helena Island, SC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sheryl De Luca
SHERYL DE LUCA NIXON & VANDERHYE P.C.901 N GLEBE RD FL 11ARLINGTON, VA 22203-1853UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Golf putting aids, namely, putting path trainer; Golf putting aid, namely a training and analysis system that utilizes grid boxes, microprocessors, memory, electronic recording and display screens and electronic tracers attachable to putters to develop and record both a successful putting stroke and reading of the greens; Golf putting aids, namely, grid-boxes with a computer screen and an adjustable wall to record all types of putting strokes; Golf putting aids, namely, electronic tracers attached to a putter head that record the putting stroke on a computer screen; Golf putting aids, namely, a stand-alone device containing a computer and optical sensors which assesses a putting stroke made over the device and which analyzed the stroke and provides feedback through computer printout on an electronic display screen; Golf putting aids, namely stand alone grid boxes with adjustable walls designed for practice puts to improving muscle memory; Golf putting aid, namely, a grid box with a clear acrylic insert that replicates tracings from a computer screen of a putter's prerecorded ideal stroke data; Golf putting aids, namely, a grid box with a clear acrylic insert that replicates tracings from the computer screen of a putter's recorded ideal stroke where the grid box has an adjustable wall so that muscle memory through practice is further enhanced; Golf putting aids, namely, aiming device placed on the back of a grid box to aid in reading greens; Golf putting aids, namely, a clear acryic insert containing a user's pre-recorded ideal putting path data that can be removed from a grid-box and taken to the green for on-the-spot practice; Golf putting stroke training system comprised of a putting board with a putting section and an electronic recording section that records stroke paths of a putter head, and a processor that correlates successful strokes with respective ones of the stroke paths, and where the processor generates a preferred stroke path based on an average of the successful strokes; Golf putting stroke training system comprising a putting board, microprocessor and electronic recording and display screens used for analyzing a putting stroke and for training; Golf putting aids, namely, a putting board or screen with an electronic stroke recording device that electronically illustrates a putting stroke path to assist a golfer in making consistent and accurate putting strokes; A putting stroke training system comprising a putting board with a stroke recording section having an electronic recording screen to record stroke paths of a putter head where the electronic recording screen is coupled with a memory that stores the putter head stroke paths based on signals from the electronic recording screen and a result section to record a result of each stroke of the putter head and identify successful strokes, a stroke analysis tool that includes a computer processor communicating with the electronic recording screen and the result section to correlate successful strokes with respective ones of the stroke paths recorded by the stroke recording section and to generate a preferred stroke path based on the respective ones of the stroke paths correlated with the successful strokes that can display the preferred stroke on the electronic recording screen and an alignment tool that includes a putting guide that graphically illustrates the preferred stroke; Golf putting stroke training system, comprising a putting board and an electronic board section that detects dynamic characteristics of a golf ball rolling over the electronic board; golf putting aids, namely, a portable alignment tool in the nature of a grid box, where the putting guide is positioned inside the grid box on the bottom; Golf putting aids, namely, a putting board with a stroke recording section, an alignment tool in the form of a grid box that is cooperable with the putting board, electronic tracers attachable to a putter head and a stroke analysis tool; Golf putting aids, namely, electronic tracers attached to a putter head to record the golfer's ideal putting path that is designed to work with diagnostic computer screens, which provide customized printout for a golfer's putting pathway; Golf putting aids, namely, grid boxes containing an aiming device that is utilized by the golfer to make judgments for the proper aim; Golf putting aids, namely, portable clear acrylic insert to grid box with ability to hold the putter's diagnostic swing information for drawback, speed of club motion and rotation of club face | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 30, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 4, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 15, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 1, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 19, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 27, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |