Drawing for REAL EYED

USPTO serial 86109587

REAL EYED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FINK, GINA M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with REAL EYED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Lackenbach Siegel LLPNancy Dwyer Chapman, Renee L. Duff, Cathy E. ShoreScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016An adhesive stickers used for attaching to products and scanning to determine whether the product is authenticABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 4, 2014MAB5ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 4, 2014ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 2, 2014EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 26, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 25, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 6, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jul 23, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 9, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 9, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 9, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 24, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 24, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 24, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance