USPTO serial 86109733
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joan Rochman, Esq.
Joan Rochman, Esq. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP11355 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Promoting the charitable services of others, namely, providing individuals with information about various charities for the purpose of making donations to charities; providing a website featuring information about promoting charitable donations of others | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Charitable fundraising services, namely, providing individuals with the information and opportunity to make monetary donations to the charitable causes of subscribing non-profit entities; and accepting and administering monetary charitable contributions | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Information transmission via electronic communications networks; and providing email and electronic messaging services, all for philanthropic and charitable purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by non-profit organizations for creating informational websites, tracking fundraising goals, for facilitating and accounting for financial payments from donors, in the field of non-profit, charitable fundraising | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 28, 2015 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 28, 2015 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 24, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 27, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 28, 2014 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2014 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2014 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 21, 2014 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 21, 2014 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 1, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 12, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |