Drawing for CONCERNLINK

USPTO serial 86109733

CONCERNLINK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONCERNLINK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joan Rochman, Esq.

Joan Rochman, Esq. MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS LLP11355 W. Olympic Blvd.Los Angeles, CA 90064UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Promoting the charitable services of others, namely, providing individuals with information about various charities for the purpose of making donations to charities; providing a website featuring information about promoting charitable donations of othersACTIVE—
036Charitable fundraising services, namely, providing individuals with the information and opportunity to make monetary donations to the charitable causes of subscribing non-profit entities; and accepting and administering monetary charitable contributionsACTIVE—
038Information transmission via electronic communications networks; and providing email and electronic messaging services, all for philanthropic and charitable purposesACTIVE—
042Software as a service (SAAS) services, namely, hosting software for use by non-profit organizations for creating informational websites, tracking fundraising goals, for facilitating and accounting for financial payments from donors, in the field of non-profit, charitable fundraisingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 28, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 28, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 24, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 20, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 27, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 27, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 28, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 26, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 26, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 26, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 27, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 21, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 1, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 15, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance