Drawing for SAY IT WITH MUSIC

USPTO serial 86109806

SAY IT WITH MUSIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MESSICK, TABITHA LEE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SAY IT WITH MUSIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David Dellenbach

DAVID DELLENBACH WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E SOUTH TEMPLE STE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111-1011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Internet, Radio, and Television Broadcasting Services; Internet broadcasting services; Transmission of information by electronic communications networksACTIVE—
041Entertainment services, namely, arranging of contests; production of plays, television shows, and motion pictures; conducting contests in the field of motion pictures, and services in the nature of filming, production, and post-production services in the field of motion pictures; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests; Entertainment services, namely, conducting contests and tournaments in the fields of music and videos; Entertainment services in the nature of recording, production, and post-production services in the field of music; Providing a website featuring news and information in the field of music, audio and video entertainment, contests; Music Production Services; Record production; Producing music; Production of sound recordings; Providing entertainment services in the field of music via internet, namely, conducting contests and tournaments in the nature of music competitionsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2018MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 26, 2018ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 30, 2017NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2017PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 10, 2017NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 24, 2017PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 12, 2017CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 12, 2017XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2017GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 12, 2017CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 14, 2016GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2016GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 14, 2016CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 31, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Aug 31, 2016DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 30, 2016ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 24, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 24, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 23, 2015RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 21, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 21, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 21, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 20, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 7, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance