Drawing for LINEARLINC

USPTO serial 86110497

LINEARLINC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LINEARLINC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B. Lasky

MICHAEL B. LASKY LUNDBERG & WOESSNER P.A.PO BOX 2938MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0938UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud-based application software for control and monitoring and management of home automation and security systems; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable cloud-based application software for remote operation, management and monitoring of security and home automation systems via cellular, wireless or wired networksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 13, 2021ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 15, 2017ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Jan 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 16, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 21, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED
Apr 21, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 8, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Apr 1, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED
Mar 13, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Mar 5, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Mar 4, 2015TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 4, 2015CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 4, 2015ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED
Sep 11, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED
Sep 11, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 11, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Aug 29, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 27, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 21, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
May 7, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY
Feb 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 16, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED
Nov 8, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance