USPTO serial 86111279
NUAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NUAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Business technology software consultation services; Computer services, namely, on-site management of information technology (IT) systems; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems of others; Computer services, namely, remote management of the information technology (IT) systems for others; Computer technology support services, namely, help desk services; Consulting in the field of information technology; Consulting in the field of telecommunications technology; Consulting in the field of virtualization technologies for enterprises and businesses; File sharing services, namely, providing a website featuring technology enabling users to upload and download electronic files; Franchising services, namely, planning and design of information technology systems for business franchises; Information technology consulting services; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technological purposes and providing backup computer programs and facilities; Planning, design and implementation of computer technologies for others; Planning, design and management of information technology systems; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables internet users to share documents, images and videos; Providing a web site featuring technology that enables users to request and record ideas, suggestions, and comments from other users in any field of business or general interest; Providing a web site that features information on computer technology and programming; Providing a website featuring technology that enables subscribers to transfer files to and from a file transfer protocol server; Providing a website featuring technology that enables users to organize and manage postmarked e-mails; Providing an interactive website featuring technology that allows users to enter, access, and synthesize information and generate reports for use in consulting with executives and businesses; Providing an Internet website portal in the fields of technology and software development; Providing an on-line network environment that features technology that enables users to share data; Providing information in the fields of technology and software development via an on-line website; Providing technology consulting in the field of social media; Research services in the field of information and telecommunications technology; Satellite telecommunications technology service to allow efficiencies of the carrier by creating efficient use of bandwidth on a satellite transponder; Scientific and technological services, namely, research and design in the field of computer and networking hardware and software; Technical consulting services in the fields of datacenter architecture, public and private cloud computing solutions, and evaluation and implementation of internet technology and services; Technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; Technological consultation in the technology field of computer and networking hardware and software; Technological planning and consulting services in the field of computer and networking hardware and software; Technology advice provided to Internet users by means of a support hotline | ACTIVE | Apr 22, 2012 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 11, 2016 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 20, 2016 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2016 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 5, 2016 | TPDD | TEAS DUE DILIGENCE PETITION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 25, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 16, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 16, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 13, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 10, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |