Drawing for VALENTINA CARRANO

USPTO serial 86111725

VALENTINA CARRANO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ARANT, LUCY
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with VALENTINA CARRANO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan Upton Douglass

SUSAN UPTON DOUGLASS FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C.866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Handbags, wallets, and luggageACTIVE—
025BeltsACTIVE—
035Retail store services featuring footwear, leather goods and fashion accessoriesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 23, 2016MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 21, 2016ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 24, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 24, 2015CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 9, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 9, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 9, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Apr 7, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Apr 7, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 18, 2014DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Mar 17, 2014AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 7, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 25, 2014DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 25, 2014ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Feb 23, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 23, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 23, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance