USPTO serial 86111901
TRUCKGUYSTV
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, SUSAN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TRUCKGUYSTV?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Kanata, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James T. Nikolai
JAMES T. NIKOLAI NIKOLAI & MERSEREAU, P.A.900 2ND AVE S STE 1550MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3352UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable podcasts featuring information and trucks and trucking; Computer game software and computer game programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Radio and television broadcasting services and broadcasting radio and television programs via the Internet; and Video-on-demand transmission services | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Providing a website featuring transportation information concerning transportation issues regarding trucks, trucking and the transport industry via the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Entertainment services, namely, production and distribution of ongoing television and radio programs in the field of trucks, trucking and the trucking and transport industry; Provision of entertainment in the nature of an ongoing television series related to trucks, trucking and the trucking and transport industry; Entertainment services, namely, providing radio and television programs in the field of trucks, trucking, and the trucking and transport industry for accessing via communication and computer networks; and Providing an Internet website portal featuring on-line non-downloadable videos, motion picture clips, and other multimedia programs in the field of education and entertainment about trucks, trucking, and the trucking and transport industry | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an on-line website and interactive website featuring technology that allows users to upload, download and share information relating to trucks, trucking, and the trucking and transport industry and films featuring entertainment and education in the field of trucks, trucking, and the trucking and transport industry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blomeley TransMedia Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 039
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named TRUCKGUYSTV
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2017 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 26, 2017 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 18, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2015 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 8, 2015 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2015 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 8, 2015 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 15, 2015 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 15, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2015 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 2, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 22, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |