Drawing for GROW EQ

USPTO serial 86112286

GROW EQ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GROW EQ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Children's educational software; Computer application software for mobile phones, namely, software for tracking, assessing and analyzing personal health data and goals for individual use as well as for collaboration; Computer game software; Computer game software focusing on achieving a set of goals, positions, ownership, and credentials, and professional and social status, and good fortune necessary to succeed professionally and personally, and not referring either to a group of software for use in commerce or to a group of officesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jul 2, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 22, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 22, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Feb 11, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 13, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 13, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 13, 2014TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 29, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 29, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 9, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 27, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 25, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 24, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 24, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Mar 20, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 14, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 13, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2014GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2014GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 28, 2014CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 22, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 9, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance