USPTO serial 86112693
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. ANNA MCCOY McCoy Russell LLP806 SW BroadwaySuite 600Portland, OR 97205| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Conferencing management software for communications and conferencing services, namely, software for use in providing access to telephone, video and Internet conferences through a conferencing system; conferencing management software for processing, transmitting, receiving, recording, reproducing, and managing sound, and images in online and mobile meetings and conferences through a conferencing system; conferencing management software for use in connecting users of computer networks, wireless electronic communications devices, communications networks, information services networks, local computer networks, global computer networks, and the internet; conferencing management software platforms for scheduling, hosting, joining, managing, and streaming audio conferences, network conferences, teleconferences, telephone conferences, video conferences, video teleconferences, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) conferences, web conferences, and instant messaging via the internet through a conferencing system | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telephone call management services for others, namely, telephone call bridging; Communications and conferencing services, namely, providing telephone, video and internet communications services and equipment for telephone, video and internet conferencing; communication services, namely, transmitting and streaming voice, messages, data, documents, signals, images, video, digital media content, and audio, visual, and audiovisual materials via computers, electronic devices, communications networks, information services networks, data networks, local computer networks, global computer networks, and the internet; providing access and communications connections to multinational telecommunication networks; video conferencing services; video teleconferencing services; web conferencing services; providing on-line electronic bulletin boards for transmission of messages among computer users concerning topics of general interest to users; electronic transmission of messages and data; electronic, electric and digital transmission of voice, data, images, signals and messages | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing a web hosting platform for others for organizing and conducting meetings, social events and interactive text, audio, and video discussions; providing temporary use of on-line non-downloadable computer software for scheduling, hosting, joining, managing, and streaming audio conferences, network conferences, teleconferences, telephone conferences, video conferences, video teleconferences, voice over internet protocol (VOIP) conferences, web conferences, and instant messaging via the internet through a conferencing system; computer services, namely, design, creation, hosting, and maintenance of online and mobile applications for others for organizing and conducting online meetings, gatherings, conferences and interactive discussions | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 20, 2017 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 20, 2017 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2017 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2017 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 8, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 3, 2016 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 2, 2016 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2016 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 1, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 14, 2015 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 17, 2015 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 28, 2015 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 15, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 26, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 25, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 23, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 18, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 18, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |