USPTO serial 86112755
GPS GREAT PEOPLE SOLUTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 31, 2017
- Examiner
- REIHNER, DAVID
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with GPS GREAT PEOPLE SOLUTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael J. Brown
Michael J. Brown Michael J Brown Law Office LLC354 Eisenhower ParkwayPlaza 1, 2nd Floor, Suite 2025Livingston, NJ 07039Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management consulting, personnel and human resources consulting services in the field of recruitment and selection, staff and succession planning, business and personal performance diagnostics, performance management and evaluation, talent pool management, talent strategy advice, resume and career advice, development, skill assessment, and competency evaluation of current and future personnel; testing to determine job competency; business organizational and operational reviews, compilation of human resource information; data gathering through salary and benefits surveys; compilation of human resource statistics into human resource databases; workforce out-sourcing, relocation services for businesses; psychometric testing services, namely, development and application of standardized, statistically based protocols for the quantitative measurement, profiling and analysis of cognitive and problem solving ability, psychological and personality traits, occupational competencies, aptitude, and work preferences all for use in recruitment, selection, and placement of personnel | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2024 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Apr 29, 2024 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 31, 2023 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 31, 2022 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2017 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 15, 2017 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2017 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 2017 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2017 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2017 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2017 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 19, 2017 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2017 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2016 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2016 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2016 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 22, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |