USPTO serial 86112797
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Plus Government fees of $4,250
Sam Carbis Asset Management, LLC
Florence, SC, US
Sam Carbis Asset Management, LLC
Florence, SC, US
Sam Carbis Asset Management, LLC
Florence, SC, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan Francis Hickey
Bryan Francis Hickey HAYNSWORTH SINKLER BOYD, P.A.1 N MAIN ST FL 2GREENVILLE, SC 29601-2770United States| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal mobile and stationary loading and access equipment, namely, catwalk systems, comprised of various metal shapes and components, namely, gratings, rails, ladders, staircases and other components sold as a unit; expansion towers, gangways, marine gangways, [ loading arms, ] loading racks, stairs, stair towers and handrail systems comprised of various metal shapes and components, namely, gratings, rails, ladders, staircases and other components sold as a unit, all made of aluminum or steel; and platforms made of aluminum or steel; and Metal stairs and manually moveable metal platforms for use in accessing rail cars, trucks, and other transport vehicles, and ground support equipment, namely, fall protection enclosures and fall prevention enclosures for rolling stock made of metal, aircraft maintenance ladders, [ B-1 stands, ] and mobile work platforms for aviation; and elevating work platforms made of aluminum | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2013 |
| 007 | Machines and machine parts therefor, namely, mobile and stationary loading and access equipment, namely, [ loading arms, ] elevating work platform machines, and catwalk machine systems comprised of operating controls, bearings, driving chains, gear boxes, guards, hoists, hydraulic engines and motors, loading ramps, pumps, swivels, valves, pneumatic cylinders, replacement slings or winches, all being part of machines | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
| 037 | Transfer technology, namely, technical consultation in the field of installation of custody transfer, and related equipment and devices and loading and unloading applications, namely, loading racks, access equipment, fall prevention equipment, transloading equipment, and platforms on which equipment used to transfer liquids or products, namely, pipes, pumps and valves are mounted | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
| 041 | Field services, namely, training related to equipment and devices for loading, unloading and material transportation | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2015 |
| 042 | Technical consultancy in relation to technical applications in the field of product transfer, namely, fluid handling and dry bulk loading; and field services, namely, providing technical advice and consultancy with the customer in relation to technical applications in the field of project management, maintenance, and inspections related to equipment and devices for loading, unloading and material transportation and transfer | ACTIVE | Oct 31, 2014 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jun 15, 2026 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 13, 2026 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2023 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 28, 2023 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 5, 2023 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2016 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 16, 2016 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 15, 2016 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2016 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 8, 2016 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 8, 2016 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 17, 2016 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2016 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 14, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2015 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 12, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 26, 2015 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 22, 2015 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 25, 2014 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2014 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2014 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 21, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 21, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 20, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |