Drawing for THE DO SCHOOL

USPTO serial 86113297

THE DO SCHOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, DOUGLAS
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE DO SCHOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Christian Burghart

CHRISTIAN BURGHART H. ROSKE & ASSOCIATES LLP500 5TH AVE STE 4810NEW YORK, NY 10110-4899UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper, cardboard and goods made from these materials, namely, paper instructional and teaching materials in the field of business and social development, and cardboard containers; printed instructional and teaching materials in the field of business and social developmentACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely, conducting classes, seminars and workshops in the field of business and social development; providing of training in the areas of business and social development; entertainment through social events and meetings namely, arranging, organizing, and hosting social events, get-togethers, parties for students, members, guests and sponsors; sporting and cultural activities, namely, organizing community sporting and cultural events for sponsors, guests and students of educational programsACTIVE—
042Scientific research services in the field of business and social development and scientific design of computer software in the field of business and social development; industrial analysis and research services, namely, in the field of business and social development; design and development of computer software in the field of business and social developmentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 3, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 3, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 24, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 22, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 22, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 18, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Apr 17, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 17, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 11, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 11, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 11, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance