USPTO serial 86113345
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David M. Tener, Esq.
DAVID M. TENER, ESQ. CAESAR, RIVISE, BERNSTEIN, COHEN & POKOTILOW, LTD.1635 MARKET ST FL 11PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-2212UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Anti-aging creams; Anti-wrinkle cream; Baby lotion; Baby wipes; Bar soap; Bath gels; Beauty gels; Body lotion; Body wash; Facial cleansers; Gels for cosmetic purposes; Gift baskets containing non-medicated bath preparations and cosmetic preparations; Hair care preparations; Hair conditioners; Hair conditioners for babies; Hand cream; Hand lotions; Lip balm; Liquid soaps; Moisturizing preparations for the skin; Non-medicated diaper rash cream; Non-medicated foot cream; Non-medicated foot lotions; Non-medicated skin care preparations; Sachets; Shampoos; Shampoos for babies; Shower gels; Skin conditioning creams for cosmetic purposes; Skin moisturizing gel; Heel moisturizers | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Towels | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Layettes | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gift baskets containing plush toys; Plush toys | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2014 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 2, 2014 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GPRN | NOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 5, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 20, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |