Drawing for TRIBUNE STUDIOS

USPTO serial 86113586

TRIBUNE STUDIOS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TRIBUNE STUDIOS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Salvador K. Karottki

SALVADOR K. KAROTTKI TRIBUNE COMPANY435 N MICHIGAN AVE FL 2CHICAGO, IL 60611-4024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041Entertainment services, namely, television and motion picture production and distribution; movie studio services, namely, operating a movie studioACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 2, 2019ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 7, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 25, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jun 16, 2015NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jun 16, 2015PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2015PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 8, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 8, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 4, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 4, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 9, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 9, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 20, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 6, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 5, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 25, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 24, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 24, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 25, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 5, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 21, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 20, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance