Drawing for INCREDIPOOL

USPTO serial 86114010

INCREDIPOOL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INCREDIPOOL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cecilia R. Dickson

Cecilia R. Dickson The Webb Law Firm420 Ft. Duquesne Blvd., Suite 1200One Gateway CenterPittsburgh, PA 15222

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Solid sanitizing chemicals, namely, chlorine tablets, for chlorination and sanitation of water for swimming pools, potable water, waste water and industrial use, charged in dispensing containersACTIVE—
011Water treatment equipment, namely, sanitizing units for use with chlorine tablets, for industrial use, for potable water and for swimming poolsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 3, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Dec 3, 2016EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Nov 23, 2016EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Nov 23, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 28, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 21, 2016ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jun 24, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 23, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 19, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 19, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 6, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 6, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jan 12, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 11, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jan 8, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Nov 12, 2015EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Nov 12, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 29, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 29, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Apr 29, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 29, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 18, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 11, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 24, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 18, 2014EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Nov 14, 2014EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 14, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2014EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 27, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 1, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 1, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 12, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 25, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 21, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 21, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 16, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 16, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 15, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 12, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance