USPTO serial 86114192
HEALICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STOIDES, KATHERINE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HEALICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Milwaukee, WI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel E. Kattman
DANIEL E KATTMAN REINHART BOERNER VAN DEUREN SC1000 N WATER STSTE 1900MILWAUKEE, WI 53202-6648Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Providing on-line, non-downloadable, Internet-based software for health coaching to individual consumer patients in connection with employer operated onsite wellness programs offered to employees | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
| 044 | Providing worksite biometric screenings to consumer patients on behalf of employers; Health assessment services, namely, providing individual and aggregate health risk reports to employees as part of employer sponsored wellness programs | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 7, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 23, 2016 | EXDM | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED AS MOOT | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 7, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 7, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 7, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Nov 7, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 7, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 5, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |