USPTO serial 86114489
DUE NORTH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 4769546Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 7, 2015
- Examiner
- ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUE NORTH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Anna McCoy
B. Anna McCoy McCoy Russell LLP1410 NW Johnson StSuite 201Portland, OR 97209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business services, namely, structuring, optimizing and change management consulting related to product and business development solutions; business consulting services, namely, structuring, optimizing and change management consulting related to emerging businesses and technology development; business services, namely, business case development and business case analysis; business management consulting services, namely, providing advice to business organizations through building an abstract representation of a real world financial situation for the purpose of forecasting and evaluating business finances, competitive market analysis, monetization analysis, product development investigation and product development analysis, and market-based research regarding intellectual property valuation; business case development and market analysis programs; business consultancy and business advisory services in the field of technology and innovation management, product development, fundraising and financing, market-based technology valuation and management; provision of business information; market analysis, namely, business research in the field of product development and business research in the fields of advanced medical technology, medical device technology, medical informatics, renewable energy technology, and clean technology; developing business strategies, monetization strategies and market readiness for technology companies in the fields of advanced medical technology, medical device technology, medical informatics, renewable energy technology, and clean technology; preparing business, market analysis and financial reports for business or commercial purposes containing financial and economic information featuring strategies for growth of technology businesses and business development solutions for commercializing technology and driving product development | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 18, 2015 |
| 042 | Technology research and design in the field of product development; scientific and industrial research, namely, technical research and development of new products in the fields of new information technologies, advanced medical technology, medical device technology, medical informatics, renewable energy technology, and clean technology; technological data mining; technology consultancy and advisory services, namely, technological research in the fields of advanced medical technology, medical device technology, medical informatics, renewable energy technology, and clean technology | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Feb 18, 2015 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 7, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 6, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2015 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 5, 2015 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE MAILED | — |
| Jun 4, 2015 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2015 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 1, 2015 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| May 5, 2015 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 5, 2015 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Nov 11, 2014 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 16, 2014 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 27, 2014 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 9, 2014 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 31, 2014 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 21, 2014 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 29, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| May 29, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 30, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 4, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Feb 25, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 12, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |