Drawing for ELTO

USPTO serial 86115791

ELTO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FLOWERS, JAY K
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ELTO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather A. Dunn

HEATHER A. DUNN DLA PIPER LLP (US)555 MISSION ST STE 2400SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-0922UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Marketing consulting; operating an online marketplace for buyers and sellers of design, web development and digital marketing services; creative marketing design services; planning, design, development, maintenance, tracking and reporting of online marketing activities for third parties; computer services, namely, search engine optimizationACTIVE—
038Providing online forums, chat rooms, email, instant messaging, and VOIP services for transmitting via electronic communications networks messages, data, video, and audio clips concerning design, development and digital marketing servicesACTIVE—
042providing a website that allows users to customize websites and website themes, and allows users to enter, access, track and monitor web design, web development, and digital marketing campaigns; website design and development for others; tracking and reporting online website performance to and consulting related thereto to improve the efficiency of technological website performanceACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 18, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 18, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jun 16, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 16, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 21, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 21, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 1, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 13, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 2, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 29, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 28, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 28, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 5, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 5, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 14, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance