Drawing for #MPWR

USPTO serial 86116450

#MPWR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BAL, KAMAL SINGH
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with #MPWR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Terrence J. McAllister

TERRENCE J. MCALLISTER OHLANDT, GREELEY, RUGGIERO & PERLE, LLP1 LANDMARK SQ FL 10STAMFORD, CT 06901-2619UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Fragrance, lip balm, body wash, deodorant, scented linen spray for use on gym bags; breath mints for use as a breath freshenerACTIVE—
014BraceletsACTIVE—
018Backpacks, cosmetic bags sold emptyACTIVE—
025Scarves, T-shirts, sweatshirts, baseball hats, tank topsACTIVE—
030Mints, namely, candy mints, energy mintsACTIVE—
032Energy drinksACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 1, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 20, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Oct 19, 2016EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2016EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 29, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 11, 2016NOACCORRECTED NOA E-MAILED—
May 10, 2016EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 10, 2016DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 9, 2016IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 9, 2016TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 6, 2016INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
May 4, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Mar 28, 2016EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 28, 2016DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2016EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2016ERTDTEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 24, 2015EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 14, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 14, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 28, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 26, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 26, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 26, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 30, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 5, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Aug 5, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 16, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jun 30, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 13, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 11, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 11, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 4, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 3, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 3, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 23, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance