Drawing for NATURAL LANDSCAPE SOLUTIONS NO-BUG-ZONE

USPTO serial 86116781

NATURAL LANDSCAPE SOLUTIONS NO-BUG-ZONE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ROACH, APRIL K
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with NATURAL LANDSCAPE SOLUTIONS NO-BUG-ZONE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Matthew H. Swyers

MATTHEW H. SWYERS THE TRADEMARK COMPANY344 MAPLE AVE W PMB 151VIENNA, VA 22180-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Natural insect-repellentsACTIVEJul 14, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 1, 2015MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 1, 2015ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2015DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 27, 2015GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2015CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 31, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 30, 2015SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 30, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 30, 2015AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Dec 18, 2014IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 18, 2014EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Dec 18, 2014NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Dec 18, 2014TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2014PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Dec 18, 2014PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 17, 2014EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 17, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 22, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 22, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 2, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 17, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 28, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 28, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 28, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance