Drawing for MW RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 86117017

MW RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, KEVIN SCOTT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with MW RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joseph A. Stewart

JOSEPH A. STEWART KOBAYASHI, SUGITA & GODA999 BISHOP ST STE 2600HONOLULU, HI 96813-4430UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Cook books; Paper napkins; Recipe books; Table napkins of paperACTIVE—
021Cocktail glasses; Drinking glasses; Glass beverageware; Glass mugs; Martini glasses; Shot glasses; Wine glassesACTIVE—
025Chef's hats; Collared shirts; Dress shirts; Golf shirts; Hats; Knit shirts; Polo shirts; Shirts; T-shirtsACTIVE—
030Candy; Candy bars; Chocolate candies; Cookie mixes; Cookies; Pastries; Pastries with fruit; Pastry; Pastry dough; Pastry mixesACTIVE—
043Restaurant and cafe services; Restaurant and catering services; Restaurant services; Restaurant services, including sit-down service of food and take-out restaurant services; Restaurant services, namely, providing of food and beverages for consumption on and off the premises; Restaurant, bar and catering services; RestaurantsACTIVEOct 18, 2013

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2014MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 26, 2014ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2013MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 15, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance