Drawing for THE PERFECT HOUSEGUEST.

USPTO serial 86117541

THE PERFECT HOUSEGUEST.

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARLYLE, SHAUNIA P
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE PERFECT HOUSEGUEST.?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lori Lee Yamato

LORI LEE YAMATO KNOBBE MARTENS OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN ST FL 14IRVINE, CA 92614-8214UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic cigarette batteries; battery chargers for use with electronic cigarettes; USB chargers for electronic cigarettes; portable chargers for electronic cigarettes incorporating an electronic cigaretteACTIVE—
034Electronic cigarettes; parts and accessories for electronic cigarettes, namely, electronic cigarette atomizers, clearomizers, and oral vaporizers for vaping purposes; electronic cigarette cartomizers; electronic cigarette refill cartridges sold empty; electronic cigarette cartridges; electronic cigarette cartridges containing nicotine; electronic cigarette cartridges containing propylene glycol; electronic cigarette cartridges containing vegetable glycerin; electronic cigarette cartridges containing flavorings in liquid form; electronic cigarette cases; electronic cigarette boxes; portable carrying cases for electronic cigarettes incorporating a charger; electronic cigarette liquid (e-liquid) comprised of flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; cartridges sold containing flavorings in liquid form for electronic cigarettes; flavorings in liquid form used to refill electronic cigarette cartridges; cartridges sold containing propylene glycol for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold containing vegetable glycerin for electronic cigarettes; cartridges sold containing nicotine for electronic cigarettes; liquid nicotine for use in electronic cigarettes; liquid nicotine refills for use in electronic cigarettesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 11, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2015NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 14, 2015NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Apr 14, 2015PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 25, 2015NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2015PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 4, 2015CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 2015XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 18, 2015GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 19, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 19, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 19, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 7, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 11, 2014AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 6, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 11, 2013PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Dec 2, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance