USPTO serial 86117753
LUMINOUS CARPETS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LUMINOUS CARPETS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
5656 AE Eindhoven, NL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KATHLEEN ASHER, DANIEL J. PIOTROWSKI, EDWARD W. GOODMAN, EDWARD BLOCKER, MICHAEL E. MARION, JACK E. HAKEN
KATHLEEN ASHER, DANIEL J. PIOTROWSKI, EDWARD W. GO PHILIPS IP&SPO BOX 3001BRIARCLIFF MANOR, NY 10510-8001UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Electronic devices, namely, control apparatus, software programs, microprocessors, circuit boards, power supply modules, data network computer hardware, transmitters, receivers, computer chips and integrated circuits, for controlling lighting systems; lighting control panels; optical lenses; lenses for light emitting diodes; light-emitting diodes (LEDs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Apparatus for lighting, namely, electric lamps, lighting fixtures and lighting installations; lighting fixtures, components of lighting fixtures, namely, electric lighting fixtures; electric devices used to control the color and intensity of artificial light sold as components of lighting fixtures; controllers sold as components of lighting fixtures; lighting fittings and lighting installations fitted with LED lights; LED modules for LED lighting systems; structural part for the aforesaid goods, not included in other classes | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets, rugs, mats and matting, linoleum and other materials in the nature of floor runners for covering existing floors; non-textile wall hangings | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance and repair of light installations and control system for light installations; consultation related to the foregoing | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom construction of lighting installations | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KONINKLIJKE PHILIPS N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Similar marks named LUMINOUS CARPETS
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2016 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 26, 2016 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2015 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 31, 2015 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 1, 2015 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2015 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2014 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 7, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2013 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2013 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 26, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |