Drawing for CHERRY BL'AWESOME

USPTO serial 86118388

CHERRY BL'AWESOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CHERRY BL'AWESOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kyle M. Pendergrass

KYLE M PENDERGRASS PENDERGRASS & TIETSWORTH LLP1645 EMERALD ST APT 2MSAN DIEGO, CA 92109-3189UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Alcoholic beverages except beers; Alcoholic beverages of fruit; Hard ciderABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 12, 2014MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 12, 2014ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Jun 12, 2014OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jun 12, 2014OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2014OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 15, 2014OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
May 13, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 23, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 3, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Apr 3, 2014ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 3, 2014PBERWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - EXAMINING ATTORNEY REQUEST—
Mar 29, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 24, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 9, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 9, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 9, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 28, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 28, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 26, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 16, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance