USPTO serial 86118769
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Seger
ANDREW J SEGER NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE EXPERTS LLC8370 DOW CIRCLE SUITE 100STRONGSVILLE, OH 44136-1799UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Advertising, marketing and promotion services in the field of warranties, service contracts, guaranteed asset protection (GAP) plans, vehicle protection products, and other risk-shifting products to automobile and recreational vehicle dealers | ACTIVE | Apr 27, 2006 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2016 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 25, 2016 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 11, 2016 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Nov 5, 2015 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2015 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2015 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 19, 2015 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 20, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 12, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 11, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 3, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |