USPTO serial 86119621
INBUILDING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 15, 2015
- Examiner
- WELLS,KELLEY L
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with INBUILDING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William A. English
William A. English VISTA IP LAW GROUP LLP100 Spectrum Center Drive, Suite 900IRVINE, CA 92618United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Providing telecommunications connections to the Internet; providing telecommunications connections to the internet utilizing bandwidth aggregation within a building or group of buildings; Voice over Internet protocol services; Consultation in the field of Voice over Internet protocol services | ACTIVE | May 1, 2013 |
| 042 | providing computer and advisory services, namely, email data migration services; cloud hosting provider services; data migration services; data encryption services; remote computer backup services; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software systems comprised of computer software, operating software, software applications, computer programs, application programming interfaces (APIs) and web interfaces for the remote monitoring and management of system upgrades; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software systems, comprised of computer software, operating software, software applications, computer programs, application programing interfaces (APIs) and web interfaces for the remote monitoring of system upgrades; software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for management, synchronization, storage, exchange, indexing, archiving, search, retrieval, and migration of email, contacts, documents, calendars, and other electronic content; computer services, namely, remote management of electronic messaging systems of others including migration of electronic messages and message systems; computer software consultation, installation, configuration, and maintenance for others; infrastructure as a service (IAAS), namely, providing virtual computer systems and virtual computer environments featuring virtual hardware, servers and networking components through cloud computing for the management, synchronization, storage, exchange, indexing, archiving, searching, retrieval and migration of email, contacts, documents, calendars and other electronic content; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer software problems; platform as a service (PAAS) services featuring computer software platforms for the deployment and configuration of wireless networks for others; information technology management as a service (ITMAAS) services. namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of others through cloud computing featuring the implementation, monitoring, management and remediation of information technology infrastructure for clients; Technical support services, namely, remote and on-site infrastructure management services for monitoring, administration and management of public and private cloud computing IT and application systems; Technical support, namely, remote monitoring technological functions of computer network systems; remote software maintenance services, and computer backup services; consultation on telecommunication services; providing enterprise-level software as a service and infrastructure as a service, namely providing software and virtual computer systems for the monitoring and management of computer-based information systems of other businesses; Technical support, namely, monitoring technological functions of the computer network information systems for businesses; planning and implementation of computer-based information systems for businesses; Computer services, namely, remote and on-site management of the information technology (IT) systems of other businesses; Computer data security services, namely, enforcing, restricting and controlling access privileges of users of computing resources for cloud, mobile or network resources based on assigned credentials | ACTIVE | May 1, 2013 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 20, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2025 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Dec 20, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Dec 20, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 14, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | REM1 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (6-YR) E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2015 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Aug 12, 2015 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 4, 2015 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2015 | PGRR | PETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2015 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 2, 2015 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2015 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 19, 2015 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 19, 2015 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 4, 2014 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2014 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 4, 2014 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 9, 2014 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2014 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2014 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2014 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 8, 2014 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 28, 2014 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2013 | MPMK | NOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2013 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Nov 18, 2013 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |