Drawing for INNOVAHOME

USPTO serial 86119686

INNOVAHOME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SMITH, CYNTHIA RINALDI
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INNOVAHOME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Raj Abhyanker

RAJ ABHYANKER LEGALFORCE RAPC WORLDWIDE, P.C.446 E SOUTHERN AVETEMPE, AZ 85282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020Furniture chests; Ottomans; Drawers; Storage and organization systems comprising shelves, drawers, cupboards, baskets and clothes rods, sold as a unit; Hampers in the nature of baskets for transporting goods for commercial purposesACTIVE—
021Baskets for domestic use, not of metal; Laundry hampers for domestic or household useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 22, 2017TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 7, 2017MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 7, 2017ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2017NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 8, 2016NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Nov 8, 2016PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 19, 2016NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Oct 3, 2016PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2016CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 28, 2016XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 28, 2016GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2016CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 12, 2016RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Mar 7, 2016RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2015GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 18, 2015CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 18, 2014GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 14, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 14, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 5, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 27, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 21, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2013MPMKNOTICE OF PSEUDO MARK E-MAILED—
Nov 21, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance