Drawing for VITTA

USPTO serial 86119800

VITTA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SALEMI, DOMINICK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VITTA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephanie C. Alvarez

Stephanie C. Alvarez Stephanie C. Alvarez, P.A.717 Ponce De Leon Blvd., Suite 332Coral Gables, FL 33134UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008Tableware sets, namely, forks, spoons and knives; butter spreaders; plastic utensils, namely, table knives, steak knives, dessert knives, bread knives, fish knives, kitchen knives, cleaver knives, table forks, dessert forks, carving forks, table spoons, dessert spoons, tea spoons, coffee spoons, serving spoons, pasta spoonsACTIVE—
016Plastic trash bagsACTIVE—
021kitchen skewers; cutting boards for the kitchen; graters for kitchen use; mixing bowls; household utensils, namely, skimmers and spatulas; cake molds; serving tongs; serving trays; plastic storage containers for household and domestic use; cleaning sponges; cleaning cloths; scrubbing brushes; broomsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 11, 2016MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 11, 2016ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 28, 2016EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Jan 27, 2016EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 25, 2016AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jan 22, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 22, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2015EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 9, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 8, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 6, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 6, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 6, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 9, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Sep 11, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 8, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 8, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 8, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 8, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 6, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 5, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Jul 10, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 10, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 10, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 19, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 19, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance