Drawing for SEPO

USPTO serial 86120106

SEPO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEPO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Miller

MARK D. MILLER SIERRA IP LAW, PCPO BOX 5637FRESNO, CA 93755-5637UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029soups; meat and vegetable-based sandwich spreads; oils, namely, salad oil; fresh dips and powdered dip mixes; snack kits comprising pre-packaged cream cheese, pre-packaged jam, pre-packaged soy sesame crackers, pre-packaged prosciutto and pre-packaged salami; flavored nutsACTIVE—
030salad dressings; sauces; mayonnaise; vinegars; salad kits comprising lettuce, salad dressings and vegetables; snack kits comprising sauces in cups; marinades; spice rubs; rim salts for cocktails; spicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 21, 2015MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 21, 2015ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 19, 2015EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 15, 2015EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 15, 2015EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 15, 2015EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 18, 2014NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 23, 2014NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 23, 2014PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 3, 2014NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 18, 2014PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 18, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 9, 2014CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 9, 2014XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 9, 2014GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 9, 2014CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 5, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 4, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 4, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2014GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2014GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2014CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 3, 2014DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance