Drawing for FLYCAM

USPTO serial 86120216

FLYCAM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEE, JEANIE H
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FLYCAM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nicholas D. Wells

NICHOLAS D WELLS KIRTON MCCONKIE1800 WORLD TRADE CENTER60 E SOUTH TEMPLESALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Movie making camera accessories, namely, camera mounts and supports in the nature of stabilizing systems comprised of rests and platforms, body support and shoulder supports being stabilizers, matte box, rod support mounts for securing add-on equipment, follow focus devices and geared rings, jib, stands, dollies, pan tilt head, gimbal head, led light, car mount, glue pod; microphone accessories, namely, microphone blimps and windshields, boom poles constructed of metal, plastic, foam and clothACTIVEDec 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2015MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2015ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 1, 2015EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 17, 2015EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Feb 20, 2015GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2015CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Dec 22, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Oct 14, 2014GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Oct 14, 2014CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 1, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 23, 2014ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 22, 2014ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Sep 22, 2014EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 22, 2014JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 22, 2014EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 21, 2014GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Mar 21, 2014GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2014CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 21, 2014TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 20, 2014CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 20, 2014TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 19, 2013GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2013GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2013CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 18, 2013DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2013NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Nov 19, 2013NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance